| Internet-Draft | Network Working Group | June 2022 |
| Yang, et al. | Expires 1 January 2023 | [Page] |
The end-to-end network one-way delay is an important performance metric in the 5G network. For realizing the accurate one-way delay measurement, existing methods requires the end-to-end deployment of accurate clock synchronization mechanism, such as PTP or GPS, which results in relatively high deployment cost. Another method can derive the one-way delay from the round-trip delay. In this case, since the delay of the downlink and uplink of the 5G network may be asymmetric, the measurement accuracy is relatively low. Hence, this document introduces a method to measure the end-to-end network one-way delay based on a reference delay guaranteed by deterministic networking without clock synchronization.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 1 January 2023.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
With the gradual promotion of new-generation network technologies (such as 5G networks) and their application in various industries, SLA guarantees for network quality become more and more important. For example, different 5G services have different requirements for network performance indicators such as delay, jitter, packet loss, and bandwidth. Among them, the 5G network delay is defined as end-to-end one-way delay of the network. Real-time and accurate measurement of the end-to-end one-way delay is very important for the SLA guarantee of network services, and has become an urgent and important requirement.¶
As shown in figure 1, 5G network HD video surveillance service is a common scenario having requirement of end-to-end one-way delay measurement. In this case, one end of the network is a high-definition surveillance camera in the wireless access side, and the other end of the network is a video server. The end-to-end one-way delay from the surveillance camera to the video server is the sum of T1, T2, T3 and T4, which is composed of delay in wireless access network, optical transmission network, 5G core network, and IP data network.¶
+--------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+
+------+ |Wireless| |Optical| |5G Core| | IP | +------+
|Camera+<->+ Access +<->+ Trans +<->+Network+<->+ Data +<->+Server|
+------+ |Network | |Network| | | |Network| +------+
+--------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+
|<---- T1 ---->|<--- T2 -->|<--- T3 -->|<--- T4 ---->|
The existing one-way delay measurement solutions are divided into two types. One type of mechanism to calculate one-way delay is based on the measurement of round-trip delay. However, for example, because upstream traffic and downstream traffic do not share the same path in 5G network, the accuracy of the end-to-end one-way delay calculated from the round-trip delay is low. Another type of mechanism is in-band OAM with accurate network time synchronization mechanism , such as NTP[RFC5905] or PTP[IEEE.1588.2008].¶
The one-way delay measurement solution based on precise network time synchronization requires the deployment of an end-to-end time synchronization mechanism. The current time synchronization accuracy based on the NTP protocol can only reach millisecond level, which cannot fully meet the measurement accuracy requirements. The time synchronization accuracy based on the GPS module or the PTP protocol can meet the requirements. However, because many data centers are actually located underground or in rooms without GPS signals, so GPS clock information cannot be continuously obtained for time synchronization. For time synchronization solutions based on the PTP protocol, each device in the wireless access network, 5G transport network, and 5G core network must support the PTP protocol, which is unrealistic at the moment. So the one-way delay measurement solution based on precise end-to-end time synchronization is expensive and difficult to be deployed.¶
This document introduces a one-way delay measurement mechanism for Deterministic Networking (DetNet) [RFC8655]. The one-way delay measurement is based on a stable one-way delay of a reference DetNet packet, named as reference delay, which is known in advance and has extremely low jitter. We can use the reference delay provided by the reference DetNet packet to derive the one-way delay of other common service packets.¶
NTP Network Time Protocol¶
PTP Precision Time Protocol¶
SLA Service Level Agreement¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14[RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
The end-to-end one-way delay of a packet with bounded delay that's sent through a deterministic network path can be used as a reference delay, which is known in advance and has extremely low jitter. This section will describe the end-to-end one-way delay measurement method based on reference delay in details . Assume that the end-to-end one-way delay of a target packet is being measured, as shown in figure 2, the target packet is transimitted through a normal network path while the reference packet is sent through a deterministic network path. At the meantime, we assume that there is a global clock which could offer very precisive timing capabilities, and we denote its current time to be true time, t. That is to say, for local clocks at sender and receiver, their current time are Cs(t) and Cr(t) respectively. The reference packet is sent at first from the sender with its local timestamp Cs(Ts1) marked inside, and at true time Tr1, the reference packet arrives at the receiver, and the receiver shows Cr(Tr1). Similarly, the departure and arrival timestamps of the target packet are Cs(Ts2) and Cr(Tr2). Since clocks at sender and receiver are not time synchronized, target delay can not be directly measured by making subtraction.¶
Target
Packet +------+ +------+
+-----------> |Normal| +---> |Normal| +------------+
| |Switch| |Switch| |
| +------+ +---+--+ |
| | |
| Reference v |
+---+--+ Packet +------+ +---+--+ +----v---+
|Sender| +------> |Detnet| +---> |Detnet| +-----> |Receiver|
+------+ |Switch| |Switch| +--------+
+------+ +------+
Reference +-------+ DTrue_ref +-------+
Packet: |Cs(Ts1)| +--------------------------> |Cr(Tr1)|
+-------+ +-------+
Target +-------+ DTrue_target +-------+
Packet: |Cs(Ts2)| +--------------------------> |Cr(Tr2)|
+-------+ +-------+
However, the boundedness of the reference delay can be leveraged for measurement, as regulated in [I.D.draft-ietf-detnet-bounded-latency-10]. The boundedness of the reference delay can be formulated by equation 1.¶
Equation 1: L - J <= DTrue_ref <= L¶
In equation 1, L is the maximum value of the reference delay and J is the peak-to-peak value of the reference delay. L and J are usually measured in tens of microsecond level precision. DTrue_ref refers to the true reference delay, and it is the difference between Tr1 and Ts1, which can not be directly measured. DTrue_target denotes the true target delay. They follow equation 2 and 3 respectively.¶
Equation 2: DTrue_ref = Tr1 - Ts1¶
Equation 3: DTrue_target = Tr2 - Ts2¶
Now we can get a relationship between the reference delay and the target delay by equation 4.¶
Equation 4: DTrue_target = (Tr2 - Tr1) + DTrue_ref - (Ts2 - Ts1)¶
Here we follow the clock model proposed by [ThomasTime] to formulate the time variation of clocks at sender and receiver. The clock model states that for a TSN-grade clock, its local time Ci(t) always follows equation 5.¶
Equation 5: (Ci(T2) - Ci(T1) - eta) * (1/rho) <=T2 - T1 <= (Ci(T2) - Ci(T1))*rho + eta (T2 >= T1)¶
In equation 5, rho refers to the time stability bound, i.e. 1.0001 for TSN-grade clock, and eta is the timing jitter bound, i.e. 2ns for TSN-grade clock. The model can be adopted for analyzing behaviors of clocks at the sender and receiver, because they are the both ends of a deterministic network path and their clocks are TSN-grade. In this way, inequality 6 for sender clock Cs(t) and inequality 7 for receiver clock Cr(t) are formulated below.¶
Equation 6: (Cs(Ts2) - Cs(Ts1) - eta) * (1/rho) <=Ts2 - Ts1 <= (Cs(Ts2) - Cs(Ts1))*rho + eta (Ts2 >= Ts1)¶
Equation 7: (Cr(Tr2) - Cr(Tr1) - eta) * (1/rho) <=Tr2 - Tr1 <= (Cr(Tr2) - Cr(Tr1))*rho + eta (Tr2 >= Tr1)¶
Now, equation 4 can be extended with known values to express its upper and lower bound. Upper bound is shown in equalition 8 and lower bound is shown in equation 9.¶
Equation 8: DTrue_target <= Cr(Tr2) - Cr(Tr1) - Cs(Ts2) + Cs(Ts1) + L + eta * (1+(1/rho)) + (Cr(Tr2)-Cr(Tr1)+Cs(Ts2)-Cs(Ts1))(rho - 1)¶
Equation 9: DTrue_target >= Cr(Tr2) - Cr(Tr1) - Cs(Ts2) + Cs(Ts1) + L - J - eta * (1+(1/rho)) - (Cr(Tr2)-Cr(Tr1)+Cs(Ts2)-Cs(Ts1))(rho - 1)¶
Accordingly, a point estimate of DTrue_target is expressed by equation 10, and its corresponding inaccuracy is shown by equation 11.¶
Equation 10: DEst_target = Cr(Tr2) - Cr(Tr1) - Cs(Ts2) + Cs(Ts1) + L - J/2¶
Equation 11: delta DEst_target = J/2 + eta * (1+(1/rho)) + (Cr(Tr2)-Cr(Tr1)+Cs(Ts2)-Cs(Ts1))(rho - 1)¶
The derivation above can be used as a theoretical proof for the one-way delay measurement approach based on the characteristics of reference delay within deterministic network.¶
The measurement steps are shown in figure 3, which describe the measurement steps at the sender side and receiver side respectively. For the sender side, a reference packet is sent. In the first step, the sender gets ready to send a reference packet; in the second step, the sender marks an egress timestamp Cs(Ts1) for the reference packet; in the third step, the sender encapsulates the egress timestamp of the reference packet in the measurement header of the reference packet; in the fourth step, the sender sends the reference packet. For the target packet, the sender side procedures are the same,we omit it for simplicity. The sending time of the target packet is according to the traffic model of real applications. Reference packets are sent for many times at first, in order to get accurate bounds of reference delay, until which the target packet can not be sent for measurement.¶
For the reference packet, the processing steps at the receiver are shown in figure 3. In the first step, the reference packet arrives at the receiver, and the receiver receives the reference packet; in the second step, the receiver timestamps the reference packet at the entrance, which is denoted as Cr(Tr1); in the third step, the receiver decapsulates the measurement header of the reference packet to obtain the sender side timestamp Cs(Ts1); in the fourth step, the receiver records the timestamp information of Cs(Ts1) and Cr(Tr1); in the fifth step, the receiver uses the source/destination pair obtained by decapsulation in the third step as the search key, queries the reference delay table and records the reference delay search result, upper bound L and peak-to-peak value J.¶
Sender Side Procedures for both Reference and Target Packet: +-------+ +------------+ +-------------+ +-------+ |Sender | |Sender Side | |Sender Side | |Sending| |Ready +-->+Timestamping+-->+Encapsulation+-->+ Packet| | | | | | | | | +-------+ +------------+ +-------------+ +-------+ Receiver Side Procedures for Reference Packet: +---------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------+ +---------+ |Reference| |Receiver Side| |Receiver Side| |Timestamp| |Query for| |Packet +->+Timestamping +->+Decapsulation+->+Recorded +->+Reference| |Arrival | | | | | | | |Delay, L,| | | | | | | | | | and J | +---------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------+ +---------+ Receiver Side Procedures for Target Packet: +-------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------+ +-----------+ | Target| |Receiver Side| |Receiver Side| |Timestamp| | One-way | | Packet+->+Timestamping +->+Decapsulation+->+Recorded +->+ Delay | |Arrival| | | | | | | |Calculation| +-------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------+ +-----------+
For the target packet, the processing steps at the receiver are also shown in figure 3. In the first step, the target packet arrives at the receiver, and the receiver receives the target packet; in the second step, the receiver timestamps the target packet at the entrance, which is denoted as Cr(Tr2); in the third step, the receiver decapsulates the measurement header of the target packet to obtain the sender side timestamp Cs(Ts2); in the fourth step, the receiver records the timestamp information of Cs(Ts2) and Cr(Tr2); in the fifth step, the receiver calculates the target one-way delay, which we want to measure, according to the recorded timestamp information Cs(Ts1), Cs(Ts2), Cr(Tr1), Cr(Tr2) and reference delay with its upper bound and peak-to-peak jitter. The upper and lower bound of target one-way delay can be caculated by equation 8 and 9, and at the meantime, a rough exstimation can be made by using equation 10.¶
The sender encapsulates the timestamp information and sender-receiver pair information in the measurement header of the sent packet, as shown in figure 4. The position of measurement header is in the option field of the TCP protocol header. The delay measurement option format is defined in figure 5. The Length value is 8 octets, which is in accordance with TCP option. The sender ID is one octet, and the receiver ID is also one octet. The sender side timestamp is 4 octets, which can store accurate timestamp information.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | Ethernet header (14 octets) | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | IP header (20 octets) | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | TCP header (20 octets) | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | TCP Delay Measurement Option (8 octets) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Data | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Kind=TBA | Length | Sender ID | Receiver ID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Sender Side Timestamp (4 octets) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The end-to-end one-way delay includes three parts, namely the transmission delay, the internal processing delay of the network devices, and the internal queueing delay of the network devices. Among them, fixed parts of the delay include transmission delay and internal processing delay. The transmission delay is related to transmission distance and transmission media. For example, in optical fiber, it is about 5ns per meter. With transmission path and media determined, it is basically a fixed value. The internal processing delay of a network device includes processing delay of the device's internal pipeline or processor and serial-to-parallel conversion delay of the interface, which is related to in/out port rate of the device, message length and forwarding behavior. The magnitude of the internal processing delay is at microsecond level, and it is basically a fixed value related to the chip design specifications of a particular network device. Variable part of the delay is the internal queueing delay. The queueing delay of the device internal buffer is related to the queue depth, queue scheduling algorithm, message priority and message length. For each device along the end-to-end path, the queueing delay can reach microsecond or even millisecond level, depending on values of the above parameters and network congestion state.¶
With the continuous development of networking technologies and application requirements, a series of new network technologies have emerged which can guarantee bounded end-to-end delay and ultra small jitter. For example, deterministic network[RFC8655], by leveraging novel scheduling algorithms and packet priority settings, can stabilize queuing delay of network device on the end-to-end path. As a result, the end-to-end one-way delay is extremely low and bounded. So packets transmitted by a deterministic network with delay guarantee can be used as reference packets, and their end-to-end one-way delay can be used as reference delays. The acquisition method of reference delay is not limited to the above method based on deterministic network technology.¶
This document requests IANA to assign a Kind Number in TCP Option to indicate TCP Delay Measurement option.¶